Should Bloodlust Be Removed? (Dead by Daylight)



Read more Dead by Daylight ➜ https://deadbydaylight.mgn.gg

Intro: 0:00
What is Bloodlust?: 0:33
My Take On Bloodlust: 0:57
But Why?: 1:07
The Other Bloodlusts: 2:13
Outro: 3:24

Twitch:
https://www.twitch.tv/farmerjohn

Main Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/farmerjohn

Get 10% off Gamer Supps using code “Farmer”
https://www.gamersupps.gg/farmer

Twitter:
https://twitter.com/The_Farmer_John

Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/TheFarmerJohn

Discord:
https://discord.gg/farmerjohn

Dead by Daylight

source

28 thoughts on “Should Bloodlust Be Removed? (Dead by Daylight)”

  1. I remember hearing a few people mention back when they first started reworking maps that it was going to get removed afterwards. Forever ago they did a few test weekends without it and they stated there was almost no difference.
    Kinda neutral towards it but nothing feels worse then getting downed only because someone decides to hold w

    Reply
  2. Cap it at level 1 and call it a day. Bloodlust mostly just helps bad killers get downs/kills they don't deserve wich just ups their MMR and makes them face survivors they shouldn't. If you're good at killer you don't need bloodlust because you've either already downed the survivor or left chase to apply pressure instead of hard commiting to a singular chase and losing the game.

    Reply
  3. I completely agree about keeping bloodlust 1 and getting rid of 2 & 3. Bloodlust 1 can help against bad map designs and is just enough to give killers enough edge to end the chase. While bloodlust 2 and 3 feel like a way for killers to just cheese chases and get downs against survivors who have played loops well. You shouldn’t have to depend on bloodlust 3 to end chases. If you do good as killer then you get the down with bloodlust 1. Survivors should be rewarded for looping well and not getting cheesed by bloodlust 3, whilst killers who also play well will get the upper hand once bloodlust 1 kicks in.

    Reply
  4. I would agree with this if made for this didn’t exist (and it being highly picked) maybe tier 2 and tier 3 values should be greatly reduced? (Like tier 1 still 5% but tier 2 & 3 only gaining a 1-2.5% increase between tiers)

    Reply
  5. I think bloodlust has a place in the fantasy of the game. It’s survivors being hunted down by legendary killers of myth and horror. They should be threatening and bloodlust disincentives survivors from preferring long chases. I think tier one is enough but maybe a 1.5 tier would be good. I think nerfing a little harder would also open up the possibility of bloodlust related chase perks. Make the activation something that requires a bit of set up or something I don’t know. Killer speed is a tricky stat though and I’m no expert on the game

    Reply
  6. Most of the time I experience bloodlust when killers just keep looping around a pallet to lowkey force the hit, it feels awful as survivor. There's no denying that BHVR's map design is a joke, but getting cheap hits from holding W is arguably just as bad, if not worse. Bloodlust 1's speed should be toned down at the very least.

    Reply
  7. Same take here and that seems the be the general consensus on the forums as well.

    To add on to it, I think with the removal of bloodlust 2/3, Bloodlust 1 should be slightly buffed to go up over time. Meaning you get a 1% speed boost every 3 seconds which caps at 5%. This would net you a little more distance in the early part of the chase to make up for not having bloodlust 2 and 3.

    Reply
  8. Tier 1 can stay, majority of the time BL1 allows me to catch up to the survivors at a strong loop.

    Tier 2 and 3 are kinda unnecessary, there haven't really been any scenarios where I really need them to catch a survivor.

    Reply
  9. Ok remove bloodlust but then take away all the shit the devs are giving to survivors in the next patches to their base kits. You can't fucking sit here and make a video talking about bloodlust gives bad killers help. When this game is so fucking survivor sided. Like you know your just fan servicing to a particular side by now. When you act blind as fuck as if they just didn't give survivors based borrowed time and isn't about to give them base kit deliverance. But i mean when you have to get that viewship up.

    Reply
  10. I love how killer mains say bloodlust is fine but Made For This is too OP? Like that's just mental gymnastics. How do they explain 3% being too much when it has an offset of losing a health state, but getting 5%, 10% & 15% completely for free with no offset? Killer mains are just as delusional as survivor mains. I completely agree with keeping bloodlust 1 though

    Reply

Leave a Comment