POOR WRAITH! – Dead by Daylight!



Read more Dead by Daylight ➜ https://deadbydaylight.mgn.gg

Broadcasted live on Twitch — Watch live at https://www.twitch.tv/tru3ta1ent

source

29 thoughts on “POOR WRAITH! – Dead by Daylight!”

  1. Nah man trust me, i play league since beta that is way back 2009, the hate you get in league, is something i never encountered elsewhere. The game got to the point where if you want to have fun, you need to make a hell of the enemy and vice-versa, the only fun you would get out of the game would be trough others suffering. I'm proud that i quit league for like 2-3 months and i don't really miss it, played like 7-8 hours daily.

    Reply
  2. Other games are more competitive so I wouldn’t say dbd is more toxic cause a lot of dbd players are chill it’s like a quarter of the players are racist homophobic & act like babies

    Reply
  3. DBD is way more toxic than any other community I've been in. I've played Dota for like 2k hours, Heroes of the Storm for about the same and League for 1k. People talk shit in MOBA's and that's it. No one is literally everything in their power to bully and make sure other people don't have fun. People smurf to beat worse players but they are doing it for easy wins, not to make people not have fun. DBD toxicity is people having fun making other people not have fun. It's way more toxic.

    Reply
  4. League is The granddaddy of toxicity. “In game” you get the afkers, rage quitters, the feeders, you know the people who refuse to play the game right and grief their own team
    because they don’t get the lane/or character they want.
    Might I add there is truly no punishment for these type of behaviors.
    So ppl remain toxic in that regard.
    Of course it doesn’t stop there you get the typical hate mail, doxxing, and swatting because you know as they say H03$ Madd

    Reply
  5. Tbh I think a lot of the DBD community is quite chill with the odd toxic person, I played league for around 5 years a while back and genuinely quit that game because of the toxicity. It's a whole different level compared to DBD.

    Reply
  6. Dota's Toxic levels are off the charts. Imagine matches that go from about 40 minutes to an hour, and knowing from the very first minute that you're in a losing game, because your team is making all the wrong decisions and obviously have no idea what they're no doing. Add to that the fact that it's an absurdly complicated game that few know how to play to begin with, so that situation is basically everything other game. You're just sitting there, stewing in anger for hour, and at the end of it, you try another game, hoping and praying that your team will know what they're doing this time only for the exact same thing to happen, and now you've wasted about an hour and half of your life and wondering why you still play this fucking game. People get mad. REAL mad, and they have no problem letting it out on their teamates. That's Dota. I haven't played LoL, but given how similar it is, I imagine the problem's pretty similar. Just a breeding ground for angry, toxic behavior.

    Reply
  7. Whatever game you play the most of, you are going to find that game to be the most toxic. In reality there are a lot of really toxic people in the gaming world in general. It won’t matter what game you play, if you play enough of it, you will come across vile people in it.

    Reply
  8. Scott Jund has a micro-brain. I don't like ad hominems, but…he also has a micro-body, which is probably why he tries to compensate with his "intelligence." Roughskies

    Reply
  9. In League u will meet people who will tell u stuff like: I will slaughter ur family and stuff. And get cancer. But the worst thing is they are legit mentally Ill or something idk.

    Reply
  10. I've lost my usernames so many times to people reporting me, even the description of my profile got reported. I've privatized my profile to hopefully stop people reporting me, i dont even play toxic like. Dbd is crazy toxic compared to most other multiplayer games i've played.

    Reply
  11. Dota is way more toxic. You can talk in game so you hear it all through not just at the end of the match. Also, typical games last 35 minutes to 50 minutes but can go all the way to two hours in rare cases. I think it's basically the same kind of toxicity but since people are locked in with you for a longer duration they get more pissed and toxic.

    Reply
  12. What happened with Tru3 and Scott was basically a standard character assassination. I'm Australian and it happens all the time to politicians down here so I can break down for you.

    1. The Goal: Scott was trying to get rid of Tru3 by constructing the narrative that Tru3 is a toxic player and bad person, he's doing this cause Tru3 doesn't agree with him and points out that SWF is OP. Scott put out a video about how "SWF isn't OP, Tru3 is just shit", in this video he repeatedly stated that he wasn't trying to attack Tru3, while attacking Tru3. This double speak is the core of the western propaganda model as by saying a line of the opposing view point, it makes their Audience think they have heard the whole argument.

    2: The Incident: Scotts audience spent an entire 8 hour stream constantly insulting Tru3 and repeatedly asking the same questions then ignoring the answers. After 7 hours of handling this with Tru3 class (Rim shot), Tru3 finally made fun of one of them by repeating the question in a funny voice. This simple little joke was the strongest responce they got from Tru3 so it was what Scott was forced to run with. (Personally I think Scott was trying to get Tru3 to attack him directly, so he could play the victim but Tru3 wouldn't engage)

    3. Constructing the Narrative: Now that Scott had something (Strenuous as it may be) he went on Twitter to say "How dare you attack disabled people!", thus creating the Narrative that Tru3 hates disabled people, feeding back into the goal of painting Tru3 as a toxic player and bad person as outlined in point 1.

    4. Echo Chamber: After he puts the point out the next step is to get it repeated by other people so stops being Scotts argument, and becomes the Narrative, He is particularly egregious in doing this as the first person to repeat the point is his own wife. Then the fans ran with it and Suddenly they have the Narrative is that Tru3 hates disabled people, and Scott can pretend that he wasn't the one that manufactured this view point basically from nothing.

    5: Fall out: In the fall out of this "Scandal" people who hadn't been paying attention simply heard "Tru3 hates disabled people" and thought that was the whole of it. As nobody pays less attention than the DBD devs, when word got to them that all this had gone down, they stripped Tru3 of his fog whisperer status and that leads us to here.

    Reply

Leave a Comment